What are Trump’s options for dealing with Iran?

The comments of President Trump at the conflict of Israel-Iran turned from full-time support to Israel’s strikes to distance himself strongly from them, and back again.

His ambiguity has added a feeling of uncertainty how only the fight are escalated.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netaniah said the attacks were “fully coordinated” with the United States.

So what factors are valid on Trump and, crucial, which are the options now?

As the Israeli projectiles hit Tehran on Thursday, Trump threatened Iran’s leaders with “even more brutal” attacks from his Israeli ally armed with American bombs.

We know Trump’s ultimate goal. He says, like Netaniah, that Iran can’t have a nuclear bomb. He was experienced that his preferred option (unlike Netaniah) over the job between the US and Iran (this route also reflects its self-described image as an actor class).

But he gave up on how to get there, sometimes he relies on threat of force, at other times pushing diplomacy. Last week, he even said in the same breath so that Israeli attack in Iran helped with agreement or would “blew it up.”

His unpredictability sometimes puts his supporters after the fact as a strategic – so-called “ludman” theoret’s external relationships. This theory is the one previously used to describe the Trump negotiating tactics and suggests that settlement uncertainty or unpredictability in escalation acts on forcing opponents (or even allies in the Trump case). He finds out attributed to some of the cold practices of President Richard Nikon.

Some of the Trump advisors and supporters back “maximum pressure”, the foreign theory of Ludska in terms of its access to Iran. They think that the threats will prevail in the end, because Iran is not serious about negotiations (although in 2015, the country signed the nuclear offer that the trump was retired later that Trump was retiring later).

Netaniah applied constant pressure on Trump to reduce the military for the Nobel Award – can eventually see the need for technic’s threats Tehrans Tehran’s threat in Tehran’s threats Tehran-has Tehran.

Israel can also be stronger behind the crowd for American involvement in, as he sees it, to finish the job. The United States has Bunker Buster Bomb Israel believes that it can destroy Iranian underground uranium editing in Fordov.

As struggles escalate, so the pressure on the Trump of Hakish camp of Republicans in Congress, which has long been invited to change the regime in Iran.

Trump will also see an argument to be able to force Iranians to negotiate with him with now with weaker hands. But still Iranian was already in that table, as the sixth round of conversations due to Trump envoy Steve Vitkoff is planned in Oman on Sunday.

The conversations are now abandoned.

So far, Trump reiterated that the United States is not included in Israel attacks.

Escalation comes with significant and potentially legacy risks for Trump. U.S. Navy Destroyers and groundwashed rocket batteries are already helping the defense of Israel from Iran’s retaliation.

Some of the Trump advisors in the Council in the National Security will probably use to do everything that could add to the intensity of Israeli attacks in Iran in the immediateens, especially with some Iranian projects that violate the Israeli-American Defense in a Defense Defense.

Netanyahu now claims that the targeting of the Supreme Leader of Iran, it is completed, is not escalated, conflict.

But an anonymous American official met some news for the weekend that Trump said he was against such a move.

One of the great political factors playing at Trump’s mind is his domestic support.

Most Republicans in Congress still requested Israel, including continuous stocks of American weapons in the country. Many loudly supported Israel attacks in Iran.

But there are key voices within the Trump of America, I’m glad again (Maga) movement who now immediately rejected this traditional support “Ironclad” for Israel.

During the last few days, they asked why the United States risks to retract to the Middle East War given to Trump’s “first” first promise of foreign policy.

Pro-Trump journalist Tucker Carlson He wrote a stinging critique On Friday, saying the demands of administration do not participate are not true and that the United States should “drop Israel”.

He suggested that Mr. Netanyahu “and his war hungry government” act in a way that would crawl into American troops to fight on his behalf.

Carlson wrote: “Inclusion in it would be a middle finger in milling voters who throw their ballots in hopes of creating a government that will eventually put the United States in the end.”

Similarly, Stauch Trump Loyalist American Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene Posted on X That: “Has anyone bothered that the United States is fully involved in war Israel / Iran is not America first / mag”.

This represents a significant vulnerability for Trump.

He adds pressure to him to put the distance between offensive US and Israel and there are signs, at least in public, that he replied.

The debation of Maga for the weekend coincided with her publication on social media to join Russian president of Putin to end for the end of the war. By week, he said Iran and Israel should agree, adding, “Now they had nothing to do with the attack in Iran.”

Iran was already threatening to attack us the bases in the region if it happens now, Washington helps Israel’s defense.

The risk of any American victims would probably see that the insulationist argument of the maggrega is growing exponentially, in turn potentially added pressure to the Trump to withdraw and denied Mr. Netanyahu to offend in an offensive for an assessment.