Lesson plans: Scotus discusses parenting rights in the classroom
News Fox News Correspondent David Stund interrupts the arguments of the Supreme Court regarding parental and religious rights regarding the policy of giving up from those who contradict their children from LGBTK-thematic books on the “Special Report”.
NewYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Supreme court Flag was held that the Group of Mariland parents has the right to decide their children from class schools that could violate their beliefs, in case of religious freedom.
Justices decided 6-3 along ideological lines in Mahmoud against Taylor that parents could exclude their children from public school systems, which contain topics with homosexuality and transderism if they feel in conflicts.
“The government burdens the religious type of parents when they submit their children to subvert” religious beliefs and practices that parents want to instill, “Justice Samuel Alito wrote” Justice Samuel Alito. “And the government cannot give the benefit of free public education about accepting such parents’ directions.”
Public schools of Montgomery County began to install books in their preschools in 12. grade, it was a few years ago, it was represented “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer signs,” said the school district lawyer. Lawyers said that the school district did it as part of efforts to be “culturally real” and teach lessons that encourage “capital, mail and politeness”.
Protests were out as the Supreme Court at school thinks the Supreme Court at LGBT books in school
People who support the right to give up their children from classes that apply to LGBTK, because the court hears oral arguments in the case of Mahmoud against Taylor, in Washington, 22. April 2025. (Oliver Contreras / AFP via Getty Images)
The Mariland Parents who sued in their request at a high court that the school board introduced books with their primary students who promoted “gender crossings, pride parades and the same novel and the novel.”
Parents said that the school board initially allowed parents to decide their children with lessons involving those books, but then they stopped it.
They also said that the presence of books created “indirect pressure that religious practice created,” which created enough burden to violate their religious rights.
Key cases of parental rights Scotus draws McMahon, Moms for freedom to gather in court steps
Ricky Rose read “Jack not Jackie” Children’s books on the rally as oral arguments at Mahmoud against Taylor, a religious holster of freedom, which includes LBGTK + curriculum, 22. April 2025 (John McDonnell / For The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Parents who brought a suit in the range of religious origin. Tamer Mahmoud and Enas Barakat are Muslims, while others fall under different denominations of Christianity.
During oral arguments, Justice Clasent Thomas asked lawyers who represent the district of Montgomery districts about whether books simply existed in the classroom or have been actively introduced to the students.
Click here to get Fox News app
The lawyer showed that teachers gave lessons to students who are books regarding five times during the school year.
Rosalind Hanson, a member of the conservative group of freedom, said Fox News Digital during a recent conversation before the case “do not attempt to change the curriculum” for parents who supported their children exposed to the book.
“Most countries across the country said that you can give up these very sensitive questions and themes, especially because of the religious component, but also because of the suitability of age,” Hanson said.
This is the breaking of the news. Look for updates.
