Republicans secure narrow victory on $9 billion spending rescission package


NewYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

What can you get for $ 9.4 billion?

3G Capital recently bought huge footwear for $ 9.4 billion.

$ 9.4 billion could cover your rent for a pretty nice flat in New York City More than 40,000 years.

Yes, it will only be you and johath until then.

Or, you can pay the costs of any major disaster in the last four decades – ranging from Chernobyl to Fukushima on the hurricane Sandy.

“Long Returning”: Senate Republicansowns all over Trump iron package with a reduction of foreign aid, e.g.

But $ 9.4 billion is not much when it is characterized by almost $ 7 trillion annual consumption of federal government.

And really isn’t much money when you take into account that they are now about sliding in red in the amount of $ 37 trillion.

What brings us to the Congressional Cancellation Plan. It is the measure of Republicans and Trump administration to reduce the consumption of the legislator has already been appropriated in March. House and Senate are now claws to return money for refund how they pulled the corporation door Public broadcasting and foreign programs assist in accordance with USAID. The original proposal cut $ 9.4 billion. But that figure gave $ 9 billion – after Senate returned money for “Pepfar”, President George V. Bush Era in combating AIDS around the world.

In other words, you may have a few thousand years old from the apartment on the lease in New York. Of course the hinges on what democratic holonaut nominates Zorhan Mamdani decide to do, should they win the election of this fall.

In any case, return to congress consumption. Or “non-consumption”.

The house brought the original version of the bill in June, 216-214. Pour one voice and account would fail on a tie of 215-215. Then it was on the Senate. Republicans had to invite Vice President Vance Capitol Hill to break the logjam on two procedural votes to cancel spending costs to the floor and actually launch the discussion. Republicans have an advantage of 53-47 in Senate. But former leader of most Senate Mitch McConnell, R-Ki., Along with Sensom. Lisa Murkovski, R-Alaska and Susan Collins, R-Maine, voted on e-Maine – produces 50-50 tie.

Vance in the hallway of the Senate during the great, beautiful voting

Fox was told that some Senate Republicans treated McConnell, which oppose GOP – and President Trump – on various issues. This includes Nai votes to start discussing an account for consumption cancellation as well as his vote against confirmation of the Secretary of the Fifth Hegseth secretary in January.

“He used to be a leader. She always told us that we had to stick together,” said one Senator GOP, who asked for anonymity. “Now he wants from voting, however, he wants? How time is flying.”

Keep in mind that McConnell led Senate Republicans as recently and early January.

But McConnell was eventually voted for legislation when the Senate was approved 51-48 at 02:28 in the morning on Thursday morning.

Murkovski and Collins were the only one to be found. Vice President Vance services were not required due to the voice of McConnell to be the absence of Sen. Tina Smith, D-Minn. She also adore and was admitted to George Washington Hospital for exhaustion.

As for older senators from Alaska, one GOP Senator has characterized as “Murkovski tired”.

“She always asks. He always wants more,” Senate Pregnant was biting.

Murkovski provided an agreement on rural hospitals in exchange for voting in favor of a large, beautiful law earlier this month. However, Murkovski did not provide several specificities to reduce and assistance for rural, public radio stations in Alaska on the plane plan.

The Discussion Senate of Trump’s 9B dollar skating account after dramatic votes in late night

“My vote was guided by an imperative arrival from Aljakanac. I have a vote I’m free to throw, with or without the president’s support. My obligation is in my voters and the constitution,” Murkovski said. “I do not agree that for example, more partisans slipped over the years. It can be solved. But you don’t have to spend the whole corporation for public broadcast.”

In the statement, Collins exploded Trump Administration Due to the lack of specificity about the precision of the abolition request. Collins, who chairs the Means for Assets in charge of federal purses, also criticized the administration a few months ago for the decline in the President’s budget.

“The package in Rescissions has a big problem – no one really knows what Reduction of programs are in it. It’s not because we didn’t have time to reconsider the account, “Collins said in the statement.” Instead, the problem is that OIMB (management office and the budget never gave details that would usually be part of this process. “

Collins was not the only Republican senator who was concerned about how the administration presented the spending package in Congress. Senate Armed Services Committee on the Committee Roger Vicker, R-Miss., Frued About Congres gave the power of purses to the administration. But unlike Collins, Vicker supported the package.

Management Office and the russell budget is woken up

The director of the American Management and Budget Office (OMB) Russell (Russ) led journalists outside the west wing of the White House 17. July 2025. in Washington, DC. (Andrew Caballero-Reinolds)

“If we do it again, please give us specific information about where the cuts will come. Let’s not make a habit of that,” Vicker said. “If you return from the executive again, give us specific amounts in certain programs that will be reduced.”

Doge recommended cuts. In fact, most reduction in consumption that has been understood by USA does not take effect if Congress acts. But even $ 9.4 billion proved to challenging cutting.

“We should be able to do it in our dream. But there seems to be enough opposition,” Sen said. Rand Paul, R-Ki., Fox Business.

So, for court votes, GOP leaders saved $ 400 million for Pepfar.

“There were a lot of interest among our members in writing something about Pepfar,” said leader of most Senate John Thune, Rs.D. “You’re still talking about $ 9 billion Rescissions Pack – even with that little modifications.”

The goal of the silence of public broadcasts violated some Republicans.

Homeland security stops $ 18.5 million in taxpayers’ funds for “radical” programs

“Public work in northern Dakoti – about 26% of its budget is Federal Financing. It is more indictments than the need,” Sen said. Kevin Cramer, RN.D.

But return to $ 9 billion. It is part of one point of one percent of all federal funding. And the dogs recommended more than a trillion dollar in sees.

“What does that say for fun if it can’t even cross this account, this pidding money?” Yours really asked Sen. John Kennedy, R-La.

Chuck Schumber

Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York arrives to talk to media members in Washington, DC, USA, on Thursday, 17. July 2025. Years. The Republican is that it will succeed in their decades – long search for completion of investment with federal resources for public broadcasting, after the Senate ordered the Senate package. Photographer: Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images

“I think we will lose a lot of credibility. And we should” answer Kennedy.

But A house is required To sync with the Senate, because it changed the account – removing the AIDS financing cut. Conservatives of the house were not satisfied that the Senate was stuck again – only two weeks after the big renovation into the home version of the big, beautiful account. But they accepted their destiny.

“It’s disappointing that we are $ 37 trillion. This was a low fruit hanging,” the tail said. Eric Burlison, R-Mo. “At the end of the day, I’ll take the base, isn’t it? It’s better than nothing.”

The director of the White House budget is expected to vomit to send other requests for cancellation of Congress spending in the coming months. The goal is to target deeper consumption recommended by the dogs.

But it doesn’t seem good for future vacation bills if it’s a lot of battles for trimming from $ 3 trillion.

What can you get for so much money? It’s not much for Republicans.

Click here to get Fox News app

The Republicans rocked for fences with reducing spending.

But in the assessment of the political box, this was recorded as just a base hit.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *