And the combiner had filed a short amicus During the legal battle between Apple and Epic Games, arguing that the App Store suffocated initiating initiatives.
We reached for legal reps for IC and Apple for comment.
The short comes during a long legal spor. Epic games She first filed an antiboding lawsuit against the iPhone Makether 2020. In a protest of an apple, which took 30% of the fee for each purchase in the App Store, as well as buying in the game. Epic has claimed that Apple unlawfully forbid developers to tell customers about alternatives to pay in the App Store.
The judge ordered Apple to stop his anti-management policy, but instead, the company implemented a link program that enabled developers to connect to alternative payment methods, With the App Store, taking a fee of 27%.
In another complaint, epic accused the apple of violations against anti-governance, and in April, the judge agreed, resulting in the order that Apple stops imposing restrictions On alternative payment solutions and collecting payments from such methods.
Apple attracts that judgment and that is why the combinator is, Backa Epic gameIt filed this amicus short in support of epic games. And the combinator asks the Court to deny Apple’s appeal.
“Both combinator – and a larger concrete community – have long indented to request companies based on an application that were bad investments due to Apple taxes,” Issued Combinator Issued. “The share of revenues of 30% can be easily distinguished between a company that can afford the scale, hiring new employees and reinvest in its product and one who is constantly struggling to stay on the water.”
Techcrunch event
San Francisco
|
27. and 29. October 2025
With the current judgment – that Apple must offer alternative payment options – for the first time in almost two decades, and combinator II can seriously take into an innovative company, in the past, “Apple’s”, “continues in the past”. The apple tax refers to the Apple Fee taken over the purchase of the App Store.
This lasted that the apple tax was a “profound and often insurmountable barrier to enter innovation of competition and innovation in its source” and that the Court should deny Apple Apple’s appeal and allow the anti-administrative rule to stand. The next argument was set up to take place 21. October.
We always want to develop and provide some insight into your perspective and feedback in Techcrunch and our coverage and events, you can help us! Fill This research To tell us how we work and get the opportunity to win a reward in return!
